Friday, September 25, 2009

WHAT WAS ON THOSE TABLETS OF STONE?

Like all good Lutheran children, I had to memorize the Ten Commandments and the explanation from Luther’s Small Catechism. This was long before everybody and their uncle wanted to stick up huge stone monuments with the Commandments chiseled into them. We just memorized them and were supposed to live by them which to my mind is a lot better than trying to plaster them all over the place. Nevertheless, some reading I have been doing makes me question exactly what should be on those stone monuments. What are the Ten Commandments that Moses had? This is not as simple as it sounds.

Of course the Ten Commandments should be written in Hebrew because that’s the way they are in the original Bible, although I am not that certain the ancient Hebrews actually spoke or read Hebrew before they moved into the promised land, but we’ll let the language issue slide. Let’s just use and English translation. Here’s a stone tablet type presentation of the Ten Commandments I found on the Internet.




Is it right? Jews and most Protestants would say it is correct. But if you are Lutheran or Roman Catholic, you’d say there was something wrong with them. The way we learned the commandments, the second commandment was, “You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain,” which in the illustration is the third commandment. We read the commandment about graven images as an elaboration of “You shall have no other gods.” Then to make up the number ten, we have two commandments about coveting at the end.

What’s going on here? Well the account in Exodus 20 doesn’t number the commandments. In fact it doesn’t even say there are ten commandments (at least not here.) I count eleven commandments, nine negative ones and two positive ones, but will let that slide also.

The same commandments (more or less) appear in Deuteronomy (which means the second law because, well the commandments are here a second time.) The difference is that where as Exodus explains the meaning of the Sabbath day in terms of the seventh day of creation when God rested, the Deuteronomy version explains it as a reminder of the days when Israel was in slavery in Egypt.


Now everybody remembers the great movie The Ten Com- mandments when Charleton Heston goes up on Mount Sinai, and God writes the com- mandments on two tablets of stone. (Very nice special effect. Even used an ancient form of writing for authenticity.) However, in the book of Exodus there isn’t any writing of the commandments on stone right after they are announced. After the com- mand- ments are spoken by God, the people tell Moses: “You speak to us, and we will listen; but do not let God speak to us, or we will die” (Exodus 20:19).

So Moses goes up to the mountain and God starts giving Moses a whole bunch of other commandments. For example: “You shall not make gods of silver alongside me, nor shall you make for yourselves gods of gold” (20:23). And “When you buy a male Hebrew slave, he shall serve six years, but in the seventh he shall go out a free person, without debt” (21:3) and a whole lot more, three chapters of laws, which Moses writes down. Then there is a party on the mountain with seventy elders, and only then does God talk about the stone tablet: “The LORD said to Moses, ‘Come up to me on the mountain, and wait there; and I will give you the tablets of stone, with the law and the commandment, which I have written for their instruction’” (24:12).

But wait there’s more. Moses goes up the mountain for forty days and gets seven chapter of instruction about building the Tent of Meeting and building altars and so forth. And only then does the narrative say: “When God finished speaking with Moses on Mount Sinai, he gave him the two tablets of the covenant, tablets of stone, written with the finger of God.” Anybody sure what was written on those tablets? It doesn’t matter because when Moses brings them down the mountain and finds the people worshiping a golden calf, he smashes the tablets.

Fortunately God replaces them. “The LORD said to Moses, ‘Cut two tablets of stone like the former ones, and I will write on the tablets the words that were on the former tablets, which you broke.’ . . . So Moses cut two tablets of stone like the former ones; and he rose early in the morning and went up on Mount Sinai, as the LORD had commanded him, and took in his hand the two tablets of stone” (34:1, 4).

Now we get the commandments:

“Take care not to make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land to which you are going, or it will become a snare among you. {13} You shall tear down their altars, break their pillars, and cut down their sacred poles {14} (for you shall worship no other god, because the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God).

{15} You shall not make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land, for when they prostitute themselves to their gods and sacrifice to their gods, someone among them will invite you, and you will eat of the sacrifice. {16} And you will take wives from among their daughters for your sons, and their daughters who prostitute themselves to their gods will make your sons also prostitute themselves to their gods.

{17} You shall not make cast idols.

{18} You shall keep the festival of unleavened bread. Seven days you shall eat unleavened bread, as I commanded you, at the time appointed in the month of Abib; for in the month of Abib you came out from Egypt.

{19} All that first opens the womb is mine, all your male livestock, the firstborn of cow and sheep. {20} The firstborn of a donkey you shall redeem with a lamb, or if you will not redeem it you shall break its neck. All the firstborn of your sons you shall redeem. No one shall appear before me empty-handed.

{21} Six days you shall work, but on the seventh day you shall rest; even in plowing time and in harvest time you shall rest.

{22} You shall observe the festival of weeks, the first fruits of wheat harvest, and the festival of ingathering at the turn of the year. {23} Three times in the year all your males shall appear before the LORD God, the God of Israel. {24} For I will cast out nations before you, and enlarge your borders; no one shall covet your land when you go up to appear before the LORD your God three times in the year.

{25} You shall not offer the blood of my sacrifice with leaven, and the sacrifice of the festival of the passover shall not be left until the morning.

{26} The best of the first fruits of your ground you shall bring to the house of the LORD your God.

You shall not boil a kid in its mother's milk.

{27} The LORD said to Moses: Write these words; in accordance with these words I have made a covenant with you and with Israel. {28} He was there with the LORD forty days and forty nights; he neither ate bread nor drank water. And he wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant, the ten commandments. (Exodus 34:12-28)

Here is where we get the information that there are ten commandments. But did anybody notice that these aren’t the same as the commandments we started with?

So exactly what was written on those tablets of stone? Deuteronomy tries to straighten things out this way: Moses is speaking. “At that time the LORD said to me, ‘Carve out two tablets of stone like the former ones, and come up to me on the mountain, and make an ark of wood. {2} I will write on the tablets the words that were on the former tablets, which you smashed, and you shall put them in the ark.’ {3} So I made an ark of acacia wood, cut two tablets of stone like the former ones, and went up the mountain with the two tablets in my hand. {4} Then he wrote on the tablets the same words as before, the ten commandments that the LORD had spoken to you on the mountain out of the fire on the day of the assembly; and the LORD gave them to me. {5} So I turned and came down from the mountain, and put the tablets in the ark that I had made; and there they are, as the LORD commanded me” (Deuteronomy 10:1-5). In short, the same Ten Commandments we had in Exodus 20 were written on the first set of stone tablets and then again on the second set. It sure would be hard to figure that out from what is written in Exodus.

Maybe some day I’ll get around to some theories about why the Exodus account is so confusing. Meantime another question. What ever happened to the stone tablets? And if you tell me they’re in a government warehouse some place, I’ll say you’ve been watching too many Indiana Jones movies.


May the Lord bless you on your journey and greet you on your arrival.

Wayne









11945

Labels:

Friday, September 18, 2009

NIGHTY NIGHT

It’s been one of those weeks that can go from delightful to exceedingly taxing within 24hours. The highs? I saw a disturbing film about a young girl in India who was married as a child, widowed at age eight, and then exiled to a widow’s ashram for the rest of her life. Later at a bookstore (where I was reading Lev Grosman’s very strange book The Magicians which is a combination of Harry Potter meets Catcher in the Rye meets The Shining meetsThe Chronicles of Narnia) I was offered for free a small cup of hot apple cider and a chocolate chip cookie. I’ve have spent hours trying to figure out the correct way to translate the Greek words andres adelphoi which is literally “men brothers,” but a professor of mine, Dr. Hann, suggests (quite rightly) an inclusive translation like “Ladies and Gentleman.”

The lows? The usual everyday struggles of people in physical and emotional need, the stupidity of people who make life more miserable, and my own inability to do much of anything other than making things worse.



In the light of all that, I’ll skip writing a blog. I am going to brush my teeth and then say my prayers and go to bed. It’s probably safer, as long as a frog doesn’t jump in my bedroom window like it did Monday night. Yes, I have screens. I have no idea how the frog got in unless it was a magic frog.

May the Lord bless you on your journey and greet you on your arrival.

Wayne





Luther’s Evening Blessing


In the evening, when you retire, make the sign of the holy cross and say. In the name of God, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Amen.

Then, kneeling or standing, say The Apostles' Creed and the Lord’s Prayer. If you wish you may say this little prayer as well.

I give you thanks, heavenly Father, through Jesus Christ, your dear Son, that you have graciously protected me this day; and I pray that you would forgive me all my sins and the wrong I have done. Graciously protect me this night. Into your hands I commend my body and soul, and all that is mine. Let your holy angel have charge concerning me, that the wicked one may have no power over me. Amen.

Then you are to go to sleep quickly and cheerfully.







11924

Labels:

Friday, September 11, 2009

AD HOMINEM

Back in the days when I taught logic, I always had a section on the informal fallacies. These are errors made in arguments. For example, it is an error to argue that what is true of a whole is also true of the part. Example, a house is bigger than a human being. Therefore, a nail, which is part of a house, is bigger than a human being. Obviously wrong.

In politics one of the most common errors is what is called in Latin an ad hominem That means “against the person.” Instead of showing what is wrong with someone’s argument, the opponent attacks the person. Let’s suppose Mr. Smith is proposing a new road. He advances his reasons why the new road would be a good idea, lets say, it will ease traffic. The opponent, Mr. Meany, instead of explaining what’s wrong with that idea, attacks the person of Mr. Smith. Mr. Meany might say, “how can we believe anything Smith says since his brother-in-law is in the road building business?” Well, that may be true, but it doesn’t settle the issue of whether building a road in a good idea. It doesn’t matter anymore than if Mr. Smith’s brother-in-law sold carpet tacks. (Does anybody still make carpet tacks?) It amazes me how many people get suckered by this fallacy.

The short-hand way of doing an ad hominem is simply to put a party label on somebody. “How can Smith’s proposal for a new road be any good? He belongs to the Whig Party!!!!” This sounds an awful lot like what come out of Washington every day. I read this sort of thing in the letters column of our local newspaper. Just call somebody a socialist and that takes care of everything.

An even worse form of this fallacy is called the ad hominem abusi You just insult the person. “Mr. Smith is a lowdown, crackpot, bumbleton.” (I just made up the word bumbleton. I like the sound.) This seems to have gotten a lot of popularity lately. Just call someone a liar and you can dismiss any argument they offer. And if that doesn’t work, punch them in the nose–unless they happen to have a Secret Service escort with them.

What has happened to civility, discussing things in a rational manner? I seem to recall a Peanuts cartoon where Lucy is listening to her little brother Linus when she suddenly hauls off and hits him. She explains, “I had to sock him. He was beginning to make sense.” Yeah, right. Only now people are carrying weapons with them to have “discussions.” Just like the old west. “I’ma gonna let my gun do the talkin.”

Maybe it’s always been this bad. Maybe I just never noticed. Maybe, I’m just weary of it all.

Weary of all trumpeting, weary of all killing,
weary of all songs that sing promise, non-fulfilling,
we would raise, O Christ, one song:
We would join in singing that great music pure and strong,
wherewith heaven is ringing.

© Martin Franzmann (1907-1976)



May the Lord bless you and me and all the weary on our journey and greet us on our arrival.

Wayne








11898
Hey! The counter just added about 7,750 extra hits and I can’t reset it.

Labels: , ,

Friday, September 04, 2009

SERENDIPITY


Serendipity–The faculty of making happy and unexpected discoveries by accident (Oxford English Dictionary). I have been told that there are no coincidences; that all things are planned by God. I am not sure about that. I do know there are serendipitous happenings. Whether these are purely accidental or or entirely planned, I shall leave for the philosophers and theologians to decide. I’ll just enjoy them when they come.

One came a week ago.
I have long known that the author George MacDonald had been an influence on C. S. Lewis and G. K,. Chesterton. MacDonald (1824-1905) was a Victorian-era fantasy writer. He was also a mentor to Lewis Carroll encouraging him to publish his “Alice” book. I had never read any of MacDonald’s books myself. A week ago I was wandering trough the Library books store where they seel used books. My eye just happened to pass over a volume in the children’s section. It was a collection of three children’s novels by MacDonald. Being interested in children’s fiction I glanced through the book. Since it was only a dollar, I bought it.

Now it just so happens that the week before some books I had ordered arrived in my mailbox. These were books (on sale, of course) that I bought solely on the basis of their description in a catalog. On of the books was Tending the Heart of Virtue: How Classic Stories Awaken a Child’s Moral Imagination by Vigen Guroian. This is another subject I am quite interested in. Among the stories discussed in Pinocchio, the Velveteen Rabbit, The Wind in the Willows, and The Princess and the Goblin. Wait! Wait! That last title is one of MacDonald’s Stories.


The connection between my two books drove me to start reading The Princess and the Goblin I am a little more than halfway though. What a marvelous story. The telling is old-fashioned, of course, but none the less captivating. You can see how this sort of writing would influence Lewis, J. R. R. Tolkien and Madeline L’Engle.


went to the Internet to learn more about MacDonald. I find that he was a Congregational minister although he did not serve a parish for many years. His preaching about the universal love of God didn’t sit well with some people. I discovered that MacDonald shared my theological problem with the substitutionary atonement. That is the belief that Christ atones for sin by being punished by God in place of sinners. MacDonald took a view that Christ died to overcome sin. This view was held in the early years of Christianity and is still the view of the Eastern Orthodox Church. It was brought back to the forefront in Protestant theology by Gustaf Aulén’s book Christus Victor.

Well, that has proved to be a very happy set of connections. Serendipity! Whatever happy accidents happen on your way, may the Lord bless you on your journey and greet you on your arrival. Wayne






4229

Labels: ,